artemis logo

Artemis Funds (Lux) — Global High Yield Bond
Q4 2024 update

Published on 21 Jan 2025

Source for all information: Artemis as at 31 December 2024, unless otherwise stated.

Objective

The fund is actively managed. It aims to increase the value of shareholders’ investments through a combination of income and capital growth.

Performance

The fund returned 1.3% during the three months to the end of December, ahead of the 0.5% gain from its ICE BofA Merrill Lynch Global High Yield Constrained USD Hedged index benchmark.

It would be remiss if we didn't mention that the fund celebrated its fifth anniversary in November. It has been a good five years, in which we have delivered significant outperformance. Having said that, we are entering the next five years in a far better position to generate alpha for clients. Yields are considerably higher than they were when we first launched the fund, while market and company fundamentals are no longer being suppressed by quantitative easing, meaning there is more room for our bottom-up approach to create value. We are excited about where we can take the strategy by the time it celebrates its 10th anniversary.

Performance (%)3 m6 m1 yr3 yrsLaunch (*)
Fund1.35.811.69.425.2
ICE BofA Merrill Lynch Global High Yield Constrained USD Hedged0.55.59.29.420.0
IA Global High Yield Bond
0.24.57.57.817.4

Past performance is not a guide for the future. Source: Lipper Limited to 31 December 2024 for class I Acc USD. (*) Fund launched on 13 November 2019. All figures show total returns with dividends and/or income reinvested, net of all charges. Performance does not take account of any costs incurred when investors buy or sell the fund. Returns may vary as a result of currency fluctuations if the investor's currency is different to that of the class.

Positives

Our holdings in the real estate sector were a notable highlight in October, with Swedish residential landlord Heimstaden AB the best performer in the quarter overall, rallying on news its operating company was accessing public debt markets.

IHO Verwaltungs, the holding company of auto parts manufacturers Schaeffler and Continental, did well after the market’s perception of the correct risk premium moved closer to our own – we previously felt that its valuation had been excessively pessimistic.

Oil & gas company BlueNord received positive news around the redevelopment of its Tyra field.

Later in the quarter, we benefited from our holding in Constellation Automotive Financing, the UK market leader in dealer-to-dealer used car sales, following a significant equity contribution from its sponsor and news it had begun to discuss the refinancing of its bonds. This was a great example of one of our core philosophies – if we can identify a company that can generate longer-term profitability for shareholders, those same shareholders are likely to find the resources needed to survive lean periods of cyclical demand.

November addition Asmodee, a producer of table-top board and card games, got off to a strong start. Although one of its games, Ticket to Ride, has been the cause of many familial disputes in the Holmes household, we like the company’s diversified portfolio of strong brands, good earnings momentum and the potential for a significant deleveraging transaction in six months’ time that didn’t look to us to be in the price we bought it at.

Negatives

US medical real estate investment trust Medical Properties Trust saw continued underperformance of its largest client, which led us to become more cautious on its ability to manage upcoming 2026 and 2028 maturities. We sold out.

German pharmaceutical Cheplapharm suffered following a disappointing set of Q3 results. While these were below our expectations, the underperformance of the bonds looks overdone to us now.

Our holding in At Home, the US discount furnishings retailer, underperformed due to concerns around higher tariffs post-election and strikes at US ports, while French fashion house Isabel Marant underwhelmed the market with a cautious outlook for the remainder of the year.

Purchases

One notable purchase over the quarter was Belron, the global leader in windscreen-repair, operating in North America, Europe and Australasia. It is known through its Autoglass brand in the UK. Windscreen repair is hugely profitable, especially to market leaders with the largest fleets. In addition, the increasing use of sensors located just behind windscreens means minor repairs now require specialised equipment to recalibrate said sensors, which acts to both increase pricing and drive out smaller competitors unwilling to invest. As the market leader, Belron is set to capture the natural consolidation in the industry.

Bonds from two of the highest-quality businesses in high yield, beauty company Coty and bookmaker IGT, entered the portfolio. At least one agency has upgraded both companies to investment grade and we believe they will be receiving further upgrades in the months to come. As they move into the investment grade indices, spreads should tighten as a new larger and less price-sensitive buyer base steps in.

We also added a position in Deluxe Corporation, known for being the leading provider of cheques in the US. While this business model may not seem like an obvious winner, the cheques part of the company is shrinking at a low single-digit rate per year, but it has high margins and produces plenty of cash. Management has been using the cash to invest in other, growing and profitable business lines such as digital payment processing and data-driven marketing services. A large yield premium suggests the market still regards Deluxe as a cheques business and has ignored its transformation.

Sales

We took profits from a number of positions, including: Applus, a provider of industrial testing; Picard, the French frozen food specialist; and Sani Ikos, the Mediterranean hotels business. Because these bonds were all trading at or above their next call price, they effectively had little further upside (but all the same downside, if not more) compared with our recent purchases.

Other bonds we sold included Multiversity, an Italian online university, and Bertrand Franchise, a French restaurant group which owns the rights to Burger King in France. Nothing extraordinary has happened in either of these businesses since we invested in them, but both bonds have significantly outperformed the wider market. The point is that just because these kinds of issuers are not in the group of over-covered index constituents towards the larger end of the high-yield market, they are often structurally mispriced and able to generate alpha even without significant market bets going in their favour.

We trimmed our position in Catalent (the drug delivery producer), which performed well following the announcement that the European regulator would not be opposing its purchase by the Novo Nordisk foundation.

Outlook

Last year was supposed to be one when interest rates were cut, government bonds rallied and high-yield spreads widened. While the first of these three trends materialised, the latter two did not. Yields on 10-year US Treasuries, German bunds and UK gilts are all higher now than they were at the beginning of 2024. High-yield spreads are almost 100bps tighter, rather than wider. In other words, the consensus going into 2024 – a weaker global economy and stronger government bond performance – has not played out.

So what will 2025 hold? While we are not macro investors, there are three good reasons to believe this year will look similar to the last one from the perspective of high-yield spreads.

  • Fundamentals: Net leverage remains low and interest cover high. Economic performance, particularly in the US, remains robust. And with yields elevated, issuers are incentivised to pay off debt rather than increase it.
  • Valuation: Although spreads are tight, they can remain so for extended periods, as they did in the mid to late 1990s and mid-2000s. And tight spreads matter a lot less when yields are high – even if they widen, the starting carry can soften the blow of any volatility. Remember, yields drive returns, not spreads – and these look healthy.
  • Technicals: The increasing demand and falling supply of high-yield bonds create a strong backdrop for the asset class.

The two main risks to the bull case are at opposite ends of the spectrum – either a significant downturn in the economy will cause concern about corporate fundamentals, or a combination of stronger economic performance and worries about stubborn inflation will cause central banks (notably the Federal Reserve) to stop cutting. In the former scenario, strong underlying fundamentals and higher starting yields will soften any blow. In the latter scenario, we think high yield is probably reasonably well insulated due to its lower duration and higher levels of carry.

In short, there are good reasons to believe spreads will remain tight in 2025 and a combination of robust fundamentals and a strong technical backdrop will drive another year of strong performance. However, given the potential for a surprise to the downside (and reasonably tight spreads), we believe focusing on the front end, driving high levels of carry and exploiting single-name opportunities as and when they present themselves will provide much better risk/reward opportunities in the year ahead.

Discrete performance, 12 months to 31 December (%)


2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Fund11.610.8-11.57.66.4 --
Benchmark9.312.9-11.43.06.5

Past performance is not a guide to the future. Source: Lipper Limited/Artemis to 31 December 2024 for class I Acc USD. All figures show total returns with dividends and/or income reinvested, net of all charges. Performance does not take account of any costs incurred when investors buy or sell the fund. Returns may vary as a result of currency fluctuations if the investor's currency is different to that of the class. Benchmark: ICE BofA Merrill Lynch Global High Yield Constrained USD Hedged Index

Notes and references

Benchmark: ICE BofA Merrill Lynch Global High Yield Constrained USD Hedged Index; the benchmark is a point of reference against which the performance of the fund may be measured. Management of the fund is not restricted by this benchmark. The deviation from the benchmark may be significant and the portfolio of the fund may at times bear little or no resemblance to its benchmark.

FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS AND/OR QUALIFIED INVESTORS AND/OR FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES ONLY. NOT FOR USE WITH OR BY PRIVATE INVESTORS.

CAPITAL AT RISK. All financial investments involve taking risk and the value of your investment may go down as well as up. This means your investment is not guaranteed and you may not get back as much as you put in. Any income from the investment is also likely to vary and cannot be guaranteed.

This is a marketing communication. Before making any final investment decisions, and to understand the investment risks involved, refer to the fund prospectus (or in the case of investment trusts, Investor Disclosure Document and Articles of Association), available in English, and KIID/KID, available in English and in your local language depending on local country registration, available in the literature library.

Fund commentary history

Fund commentary history

2026
2024
See all fund commentaries

Risks specific to Artemis Funds (Lux) – Global High Yield Opportunities

  • Market volatility risk The value of the fund and any income from it can fall or rise because of movements in stockmarkets, currencies and interest rates, each of which can move irrationally and be affected unpredictably by diverse factors, including political and economic events.
  • Currency hedging risk The fund hedges with the aim of protecting against unwanted changes in foreign exchange rates. The fund is still subject to market risks, may not be completely protected from all currency fluctuations and may not be fully hedged at all times. The transaction costs of hedging may also negatively impact the fund’s returns.
  • Bond liquidity risk The fund holds bonds which could prove difficult to sell. As a result, the fund may have to lower the selling price, sell other investments or forego more appealing investment opportunities.
  • Higher-yielding bonds risk The fund may invest in higher-yielding bonds, which may increase the risk to capital. Investing in these types of assets (which are also known as sub-investment grade bonds) can produce a higher yield but also brings an increased risk of default, which would affect the capital value of the fund.
  • Credit risk Investments in bonds are affected by interest rates, inflation and credit ratings. It is possible that bond issuers will not pay interest or return the capital. All of these events can reduce the value of bonds held by the fund.
  • Derivatives risk The fund may invest in derivatives with the aim of profiting from falling (‘shorting’) as well as rising prices. Should the asset’s value vary in an unexpected way, the fund value could reduce.
  • Leverage risk The fund may operate with a significant amount of leverage. Leverage occurs when the economic exposure created by the use of derivatives is greater than the amount invested. A leveraged portfolio may result in large fluctuations in its value and therefore entails a high degree of risk including the risk that losses may be substantial.
  • Charges from capital risk Where charges are taken wholly or partly out of a fund's capital, distributable income may be increased at the expense of capital, which may constrain or erode capital growth.
  • Emerging markets risk Compared to more established economies, investments in emerging markets may be subject to greater volatility due to differences in generally accepted accounting principles, less governed standards or from economic or political instability. Under certain market conditions assets may be difficult to sell.
  • Income risk The payment of income and its level is not guaranteed.
  • Counterparty risk Investments such as derivatives are made using financial contracts with third parties. Those third parties may fail to meet their obligations to the fund due to events beyond the fund's control. The fund's value could fall because of loss of monies owed by the counterparty and/or the cost of replacement financial contracts.
  • ESG risk The fund may select, sell or exclude investments based on ESG criteria; this may lead to the fund underperforming the broader market or other funds that do not apply ESG criteria. If sold based on ESG criteria rather than solely on financial considerations, the price obtained might be lower than that which could have been obtained had the sale not been required.

Important information

The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.