Source for all information: Artemis as at 29 June 2026, unless otherwise stated.
Global equities began to rebound at the start of the quarter before the signing of the US-Iran memorandum of understanding on 17 June. Japanese and emerging market indices led the charge, while the S&P 500 also rallied. Brent crude oil prices dropped 38.4% and inflation fears subsided, supporting credit markets. Technology stocks initially rebounded but came under pressure in June over the magnitude of financing needed to sustain the required infrastructure investment by 'hyperscaler' AI firms.
Artemis Strategic Assets contains two ‘buckets’: a Directional (Trends) Strategy, which aims to take advantage of market trends; and a Non-Directional Strategy, whose goal is to generate returns that are uncorrelated to market movements by taking long and short positions whose exposures offset one another. In both strategies, the fund invests in financial derivatives that give it exposure to a diversified range of asset classes, including equities, bonds and currencies.
The fund made a modest positive return of 0.9% over the quarter, led by its non-directional positions in currencies and government bonds. The Directional (Trends) Strategy was little changed, having peaked in May, before coming under pressure from the unwinding of currency pairs geared to higher oil prices. Returns in the IA Flexible Investment sector were driven by the rebound in equity markets, but this fund is designed to avoid being overly correlated with stocks.
| Three months | One year | Three years | Five years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artemis Strategic Assets | 0.9% | 14.0% | 9.5% | 22.0% |
| CPI + 3% | 1.8% | 5.6% | 18.2% | 47.4% |
| IA Flexible Investment sector | 10.4% | 19.5% | 41.8% | 36.1% |
Past performance is not a guide to the future. Source: Lipper Limited to 30 June 2026 for class I Acc GBP. All figures show total returns with dividends and/or income reinvested, net of all charges. Performance does not take account of any costs incurred when investors buy or sell the fund. Returns may vary as a result of currency fluctuations if the investor's currency is different to that of the class. This class may have charges or a hedging approach different from those in the IA sector benchmark.
The US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding on 17 June, including arrangements to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping. As more tankers exited the Strait, Brent and WTI crude fell back towards pre-war levels by late June, easing inflation fears and supporting risk assets. Early July has nevertheless reminded markets that the risk premium has not disappeared. Renewed incidents around shipping in the Strait pushed oil prices higher again. Energy is therefore a less severe but still volatile macro risk, with potential pass-through to inflation, margins and confidence.
Although the Federal Reserve left rates unchanged on 17 June, the guidance was hawkish. It flagged solid activity and elevated inflation, demonstrating that the US economy has emerged relatively unscathed economically speaking from the Iranian conflict. New chair Kevin Warsh laid out his plans to discontinue forward guidance and cited the persistent upside overshoot of inflation compared with the 2% target. Subsequent data have moderated rather than broken the growth backdrop. June payrolls increased by only 57,000 and leisure and hospitality employment fell, but unemployment edged down to 4.2% and wage growth remained positive. This reduces pressure for an immediate hike but does not yet support easing while energy pass-through and inflation expectations remain central.
The European Central Bank (ECB) delivered the anticipated tightening of 25 basis points in June, with the refinancing rate now standing at 2.4%. The decision reflected inflation pressure from the Middle East conflict, while updated projections for 2026 and 2027 showed higher inflation and slower growth. This is not necessarily the start of a sustained hiking cycle. The ECB stressed its decisions will be data-dependent, while the late-June retracement in oil prices provided some relief. However, early-July shipping incidents keep inflation risks alive and gas prices are still around 40% higher than before the conflict. With domestic demand weak and confidence fragile, policy is likely to remain restrictive, but further tightening would require evidence of second-round effects rather than energy volatility alone.
UK data in June were better than feared but still mixed. May CPI was unchanged at 2.8%, while services inflation rose and vehicle fuel inflation remained high. The Bank of England held interest rates at 3.75% on 18 June, but the seven-to-two vote – with two members favouring a hike to 4.0% – showed a divided Monetary Policy Committee. The Bank noted that while energy prices had fallen from their peak, they remained volatile and were still above pre-conflict levels. This leaves the UK in a modest-growth, sticky-inflation mix. Housing has shown some resilience, with prices rising in June after several weaker months, but mortgage costs and tight financial conditions are constraining rate-sensitive sectors. The bar for near-term easing remains high.
Data from China pointed to stabilisation rather than acceleration. The official manufacturing PMI rose to 50.3 from 50.0 and the non-manufacturing PMI edged up to 50.2, helped by high-tech exports and some improvement in new orders. Domestic demand remains cautious, labour-market conditions are soft and real estate continues to drag, leaving the recovery dependent on targeted support. While lower energy prices provide relief for those emerging economies that are importers, exporters have lost part of the earlier commodity tailwind. Across the asset class, capital flows remain sensitive to the Fed's higher-for-longer stance, US dollar moves and renewed geopolitical volatility. Economies with credible policy frameworks and stronger external balances remain better positioned.
CAPITAL AT RISK. All financial investments involve taking risk and the value of your investment may go down as well as up. This means your investment is not guaranteed and you may not get back as much as you put in. Any income from the investment is also likely to vary and cannot be guaranteed.
This is a marketing communication. Before making any final investment decisions, and to understand the investment risks involved, refer to the fund prospectus (or in the case of investment trusts, Investor Disclosure Document and Articles of Association), available in English, and KIID/KID, available in English and in your local language depending on local country registration, available in the literature library.
The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.