
There’s a new member of the trillion-dollar club for listed companies. Its valuation looks questionable. But to my mind it represents outstanding value and has the potential to make investors a solid return. Suffice to say I’m not talking about SpaceX.
With all the coverage about Elon Musk’s SpaceX IPO and its intergalactic valuation, you may not have noticed when Samsung quietly entered the club through a side door a few weeks ago.
It has risen strongly on the back of the surge in semiconductor earnings and now joins an exclusive group of 13 other companies which includes Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Broadcom, Berkshire Hathaway, Eli Lilly, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, TSMC, Saudi Aramco, Tesla and – another recent entrant – South Korean chip maker SK Hynix.
What is interesting about Samsung is that the South Korean giant trades on just 6x expected earnings1.
Yes, you read that correctly. The average trillion-dollar company, excluding Samsung, SK Hynix and Tesla, is priced on 24x forward earnings2. Tesla trades on an astronomical 208x valuation, skewing the average significantly3. SK Hynix is priced similarly to Samsung but there’s a cheaper way to buy it that we’ll come to later.
In the jargon of the industry, this means that Samsung is on a forward price/earnings (P/E) ratio of six versus 24. In theory, Samsung shares could rise four-fold without the company lifting earnings expectations and it would still not look out of place against its global trillion-dollar peers.
It also boasts the second-highest net income in the trillion-dollar peer group4 (after Nvidia). Strong earnings momentum, combined with a low valuation, continues to make Samsung the largest position in the Artemis SmartGARP Global Emerging Markets Equity Fund.
In Q1 its revenue spiked up to $91.5bn – compared with $11.4bn a year earlier5. Its operating profit was $39bn this year, versus $4.5bn in the same quarter in 20256.
This was a record, driven by its Device Solutions division – that’s the one that manufactures memory chips, processors and display panels. The huge demand from AI for semiconductors has led to a global shortage and enabled Samsung to hike its prices.
Samsung shares could rise four-fold without the company lifting earnings expectations and it would still not look out of place against its global trillion-dollar peers
Such demand doesn’t look like waning soon and the company is progressing with its memory chip development programme to maintain its strong position. Modern large language AI models require incredibly fast memory to keep the AI processors (GPUs) running smoothly without data bottlenecks.
Samsung’s new HBM4E chip represents cutting-edge memory technology that will sit alongside Nvidia GPUs and should help reduce heat resistance and improve energy efficiency.
Of course, Samsung is about more than just chips. Most of us know the company for its televisions and mobile phones. The margins here aren’t as impressive – 6% for display panels, 7.3% for phones7 – but these contribute significantly to overall profits.
The company isn’t resting on its semiconductor laurels. It is focused on driving down costs and raising its sights higher in terms of output – concentrating on higher-margin, higher-end products, such as large display screens and foldable phones.
It benefits not just from its own production of chips to power AI but the way the technology can be incorporated into its consumer technology products to enhance its offering and maintain its competitive advantage.
A sceptic may argue that its 157.5% share price rise this year8 is primarily about semiconductors and this story may not last forever. On these grounds, the valuation of Samsung looks attractive but not ridiculously cheap.
I wouldn’t disagree. But I would argue that if the same degree of scepticism were applied to all technology stocks – and certainly to most members of the trillion-dollar club – valuations elsewhere would look very different.
Market concentration in the S&P 500 amid the surge of mega-cap technology stocks is widely recognised. Historically, the top 10 stocks have represented around 20% of the index9. Today it is almost twice that10.
We see a similar trend within emerging markets. These have outperformed developed markets this year – up more than 25% to the end of May, versus 11.9% for the MSCI World index11. But index returns have been heavily concentrated in a narrow group of large technology and semiconductor-related companies.
To give some context to the concentration, 95% of the index returns in April were driven by technology12. TSMC, SK Hynix and Samsung alone were responsible for around 70% of the overall return13. And these three now account for close to 30% of the MSCI Emerging Markets index14.
As SpaceX floats on the NASDAQ amid a fanfare of coverage, many sensible sceptics are questioning the valuation. Will we look back on this as the point when the tech and AI bubble reached bursting point – where modest hope turned to hype and hubris?
None of the members of the trillion-dollar club are pricing in quite the Shakespearian “expectation of plenty” levels that come with SpaceX – apart, perhaps from Tesla – but there are reasons to be fearful.
Will we look back on this as the point when the tech and AI bubble reached bursting point – where modest hope turned to hype and hubris?
What Samsung shows us is there are cheaper ways to access tech and AI growth stories. Underlining this point further, we recently initiated a position in tech holding company SK Square, whose 20% share of SK Hynix represents the bulk of its own market cap. It trades on a 40% discount to NAV, enabling us to buy Hynix for a P/E of less than 415.
Being selective and applying a strong valuation discipline to your investment approach may mean you miss out on further hype-fuelled growth. In my view, though, it mitigates risk and can help you generate more sustainable long-term returns.
1, 2, 3 & 4. Bloomberg, 9 June 2026
5 &
6. https://images.samsung.com/is/content/samsung/assets/global/ir/docs/2026_con_quarter01_cf.pdf
7. https://news.samsung.com/ca/samsung-electronics-announces-first-quarter-2026-results
8. Bloomberg, total return, GBP to 9 June 2026
9. https://privatebank.barclays.com/insights/market-perspectives-september-09-2025/market-concentration-is-it-really-an-issue/ Uses data between 1990 and August 2025
10. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/SPY/holdings/ – 39.21% as at 8 June 2026
11. Lipper, total return, GBP
12 & 13. Bloomberg to 9 June 2026
14. https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/c0db0a48-01f2-4ba9-ad01-226fd5678111
15. Bloomberg to 9 June 2026
FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS AND/OR QUALIFIED INVESTORS AND/OR FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES ONLY. NOT FOR USE WITH OR BY PRIVATE INVESTORS.
CAPITAL AT RISK. All financial investments involve taking risk and the value of your investment may go down as well as up. This means your investment is not guaranteed and you may not get back as much as you put in. Any income from the investment is also likely to vary and cannot be guaranteed.
This is a marketing communication. Before making any final investment decisions, and to understand the investment risks involved, refer to the fund prospectus (or in the case of investment trusts, Investor Disclosure Document and Articles of Association), available in English, and KIID/KID, available in English and in your local language depending on local country registration, available in the literature library.
The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The trillion-dollar company that still looks cheap