Skip to main content

Capitalists with a conscience: Is the objective of a business solely to make profit?

Ryan Smith, co-manager of Artemis’ Positive Future strategy, questions Friedman’s famous statement that business is all about making money for its owners.

‘The principal objective of a business enterprise is to generate economic returns to its owners’. University of Chicago economist Milton Friedman’s famous statement in the New York Times in September 1970 about the objectives of the corporation was for many decades taken as gospel.

From the mid-1980s to the early 2000s, Friedman’s (purported) position was dominant in both academia and in the business world. Simple and catchy, it served the interests of certain parts of society. At extremis, think Gordon Gekko of Wall Street. Undiluted capitalism. Only shareholders matter.

Keeping stakeholders in the tent

Of course, the alternative model is for businesses to consider all of their stakeholders: so-called stakeholder capitalism. And since the early 2000s, Friedman’s doctrine has fallen from favour (or so most companies would have you believe), its rejection almost a requirement for acceptance into polite society.

However, Friedman didn’t ever advocate that companies should ignore their stakeholders. What he went on to say was that the only way a company can be successful ‘in the long-term’ is if it treats all stakeholders seriously. Note also that Friedman was writing 50 years ago, partly in response to the US government of the time exhorting corporations to stop raising prices in an attempt to combat inflation. Clearly, the world has changed a lot since the 1970s. The balance of power between government and corporations has shifted and we face more serious environmental concerns.

Responsible capitalism is more than positive PR

If he was writing now, would Friedman frame his ideas in a slightly different way? We suspect he might. Not least because of the passing of time and economic externalities including the climate crisis. But also because there is plenty of evidence to support the idea that business can be a driver of positive impact.

Conscious capitalism can be successful, but it clearly has to mean more than social responsibility for PR purposes. Friedman made it clear that corporations have a social responsibility to play within ‘the rules of the game and, engage in open and free competition without deception or fraud’.

Disrupting the status quo through positive change

Unfortunately, we suspect a lot of corporate responsibility still serves only to protect self-interests and maintain the status quo. Real positive impact comes when companies align their strategy with positive environmental and societal outcomes; impact through innovation which reshapes the very nature of competition and makes the company, its investors and society better off.

Which is why, as impact investors, our focus is on identifying the most innovative and disruptive companies. Companies which are at the intersection of disruptive innovation and the unsustainable status quo. Companies whose strategies, if delivered successfully, will make everyone better off. In fact, given the scale and intensity of the environmental and societal challenges that we face, we strongly believe that corporate success and above-market-returns will come because of – and not in spite of – positive impact.

Investment in a fund concerns the acquisition of units/shares in the fund and not in the underlying assets of the fund.

Reference to specific shares or companies should not be taken as advice or a recommendation to invest in them.

For information on sustainability-related aspects of a fund, visit the relevant fund page on this website.

For information about Artemis’ fund structures and registration status, visit

Any research and analysis in this communication has been obtained by Artemis for its own use. Although this communication is based on sources of information that Artemis believes to be reliable, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy or completeness.

Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current expectations and projections and are subject to change without notice.

Third parties (including FTSE and Morningstar) whose data may be included in this document do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. For information, visit

Important information
The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.